← All Articles
#hiring-process-efficiency #customer-story #screening #time-to-hire #small-business

Growing Hiring Demands Forced Xiber to Rethink Its Process

July 1, 2026

Xiber was manually screening every resume and running every early-stage interview themselves. As hiring volume grew, the process became a liability. After implementing Cnect, they hired four people in two months without recruiters and reclaimed hours per search.

For many growing companies, hiring process efficiency problems do not appear overnight. They build gradually as the business scales.

What once worked for a small team suddenly becomes difficult to maintain across multiple openings, multiple departments, and tighter hiring timelines. Screening resumes manually, coordinating interviews, and trying to identify the right candidates early in the process begins consuming more time than teams realize.

That was the challenge facing Xiber before implementing Cnect. According to Chief Experience Officer Jared Grugett, the company reached a point where its traditional hiring workflow could no longer keep pace with growth.

"Before Cnect, everything was manual. Resumes came across my desk, and it was up to me and the specific department head to pore through them, decide whom to talk to, and run every interview ourselves. It worked when we were small, but as we grew, the time we were pouring into early-stage screening just wasn't sustainable, and it wasn't actually getting us to the right person any faster. The breaking point was juggling multiple openings at once: our process moved slowly enough that candidates used our offer as leverage to get a counteroffer from their current employer, and we lost them. That's what pushed us to find a better way."

Like many organizations, Xiber was not struggling to find applicants. The bigger issue was the amount of manual coordination required just to identify serious candidates worth moving forward. As hiring volume increased, the company found itself spending more time managing the process than improving hiring decisions.

Moving Beyond Resume-Only Screening

When evaluating solutions, Xiber was not simply looking for another system to collect resumes. The company wanted a process that created stronger candidate signal earlier, before live interviews consumed additional time.

For Jared, one of the biggest differentiators was how Cnect structured the evaluation process before candidates ever reached the interview stage.

"Cnect came to us through a referral, so we didn't shop around long, but once we saw it, we knew. What stood out was the multi-step process. Instead of going straight from resume to interview, Cnect evaluates candidates along the way: the resume and work history review, the virtual interview, and the first-impression video, so by the time someone sits down with us, we've already seen enough to know they're worth the conversation. That meant our interviews could go straight to the hard-hitting questions that actually tell us whether someone's the right hire, instead of burning half the conversation on basics."

Rather than using live interviews to gather introductory information already available elsewhere, Xiber could focus conversations on deeper evaluation, role fit, and decision-making. The result was a hiring process that felt more intentional and far less repetitive for both candidates and internal teams.

Reducing Time Spent on Administrative Hiring Work

One of the most immediate changes Xiber experienced after implementing Cnect was the amount of time recovered during hiring searches.

For growing businesses with lean HR or leadership teams, early-stage screening often becomes one of the largest operational drains in hiring. Reviewing resumes, coordinating interviews, filtering candidates, and determining who is genuinely engaged can consume hours across every opening.

According to Jared, the impact became visible quickly.

"The biggest win is time. Cnect has saved us hours on every search; we're no longer spending our days trying to figure out who's a real candidate and who isn't. In just two months, we've hired four people without recruiters, and the quality is noticeably better than before. The candidates who reach the interview stage have already shown us they're serious, so our time goes into the right conversations. And it's not just us, candidates have told us how easy and engaging the process is on their end. We're finding better people faster, which is exactly what we needed."

The improvements extended beyond internal efficiency. Xiber also saw stronger candidate engagement throughout the process. Faster momentum, clearer communication, and more structured workflows helped reduce many of the friction points that commonly slow hiring down.

A Better Use of Hiring Time

One of the recurring challenges for growing organizations is that hiring often scales by adding more administrative work. More screening calls. More coordination. More scheduling. More manual filtering.

What Xiber found was that improving hiring did not require adding more process. It required creating stronger signal earlier so live interview time could be reserved for the candidates most worth pursuing.

For Jared, that made the value of the platform clear.

"If you're a growing business with a limited HR team, Cnect is worth every minute of the conversation. It lets you spend your time on candidates who are actually invested in the process, and your hours go into the hire, not the search. We're a better hiring team because of it."

As more organizations look for ways to improve hiring efficiency without sacrificing candidate quality, companies like Xiber are showing that the biggest opportunity may not be increasing hiring activity but improving how hiring decisions are made earlier in the process.

Learn How Cnect Helps Growing Teams Hire Smarter

Teams that want to reduce administrative hiring work, improve early candidate signal, and create a faster, more structured hiring experience can learn more about how Cnect is helping growing businesses modernize the way they hire.

Xiber hired four people in two months without recruiters. The difference was not more effort. It was better process.